‘Cracks’ in the scholarly communications system: Insights from a longitudinal international study of early career researchers
170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified. The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracki...
| Published in: | Learned publishing Vol. 36, № 2. P. 319-322 |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/koha:001017030 |
| Summary: | 170 early career researchers interviewed three times over 2 years, have uniquely contributed towards a stress test of scholarly communications and cracks have been identified. The perfect storm created by the convergence of millennial values and the pandemic appears to have fast-forwarded the cracking process, perhaps, for the good. The cracks in question are: (1) peer review; (2) reputational assessment; (3) unethical/questionable practices; (4) collaboration; (5) networking. |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | Библиогр.: с. 322 |
| ISSN: | 0953-1513 |