Inference and representation: philosophical and cognitive issues

The paper is dedicated to particular cases of interaction and mutual impact of philosophy and cognitive science. Thus, philosophical preconditions in the middle of the 20th century shaped the newly born cognitive science as mainly based on conceptual and propositional representations and syntactical...

Полное описание

Библиографическая информация
Опубликовано в: :Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология № 58. С. 34-46
Главный автор: Mikhailov, Igor F.
Формат: Статья в журнале
Язык:English
Предметы:
Online-ссылка:http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/vtls:000793045
Перейти в каталог НБ ТГУ
LEADER 02645nab a2200325 c 4500
001 vtls000793045
003 RU-ToGU
005 20230319221957.0
007 cr |
008 210203|2020 ru s a eng d
024 7 |a 10.17223/1998863Х/58/4  |2 doi 
035 |a to000793045 
039 9 |a 202102041248  |c 202102031453  |d VLOAD  |y 202102031444  |z Александр Эльверович Гилязов 
040 |a RU-ToGU  |b rus  |c RU-ToGU 
100 1 |a Mikhailov, Igor F.  |9 504402 
245 1 0 |a Inference and representation: philosophical and cognitive issues  |c I. F. Mikhailov 
336 |a Текст 
337 |a электронный 
504 |a Библиогр.: 45 назв. 
520 3 |a The paper is dedicated to particular cases of interaction and mutual impact of philosophy and cognitive science. Thus, philosophical preconditions in the middle of the 20th century shaped the newly born cognitive science as mainly based on conceptual and propositional representations and syntactical inference. Further developments towards neural networks and statistical representations did not change the prejudice much: many still believe that network models must be complemented with some extra tools that would account for proper human cognitive traits. I address some real implemented connectionist models that show how 'new associationism' of the neural network approach may not only surpass Humean limitations, but, as well, realistically explain abstraction, inference and prediction. Then I stay on Predictive Processing theories in a little more detail to demonstrate that sophisti-cated statistical tools applied to a biologically realist ontology may not only provide solu-tions to scientific problems or integrate different cognitive paradigms but propose some philosophical insights either. To conclude, I touch on a certain parallelism of Predictive Processing and philosophical inferentialism as presented by Robert Brandom. 
653 |a логические выводы 
653 |a репрезентация 
653 |a когнитивная наука 
655 4 |a статьи в журналах  |9 879358 
773 0 |t Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология  |d 2020  |g № 58. С. 34-46  |x 1998-863X  |w 0210-41760 
852 4 |a RU-ToGU 
856 4 |u http://vital.lib.tsu.ru/vital/access/manager/Repository/vtls:000793045 
856 |y Перейти в каталог НБ ТГУ  |u https://koha.lib.tsu.ru/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=477473 
908 |a статья 
999 |c 477473  |d 477473